The Language Models I’m Actually Using (Q1 2026 Edition)

Earlier this week, I posted about how I’ve been using AI tools to improve my writing and share some of my own experience. After that post went live, someone reached out and asked what AI tools I was actually using.

And honestly, that’s a great question.

This space is growing and changing so quickly. Some tools are starting to stand out for specific tasks. Others are better in certain workflows. So I thought, what better way to respond than to share the tools I’m using right now, where I’ve found them most useful, what their strengths are, and how you can start building real skill with them?

By the end of this post, my hope is that you feel inspired to explore tools beyond just ChatGPT.

The Four LLMs in My Stack

Claude.ai — Your Strategic Thinking Partner

I’ll be honest: prior to January 2026, I hadn’t been using Claude for anything. Then this January, I believe they released a new version, and it has literally been blowing me away. It has become my go-to for deeper thinking work — not just generating ideas, but actually working with me to think through problems.

Here’s where I believe Claude excels for L&D work:

How to practice: Start using Claude for one specific challenge in your work. Use it as a thinking partner. Ask it questions like, “Here’s what I’m trying to achieve in this training. What questions should I be asking myself?” or “Do you think there is anything missing based on the prior knowledge of our learners?” That’s where it gets powerful.

ChatGPT — The All-Purpose Tool That Can Do a Little Bit of Everything

ChatGPT is the workhorse. It’s like the Swiss Army knife of AI tools. It may not be the best at any one thing, but it’s reliable for a lot of things.

What ChatGPT is great for:

I’ve also noticed that ChatGPT’s photo generation tools have improved significantly, and I’ve increasingly been able to generate images that I can use in courses to support learners.

I’ve also created sample courses and chatbots in it that were able to help demonstrate evaluation criteria and rubrics.

The key difference from Claude? ChatGPT tends to be more surface-level. It’s faster, but it doesn’t always dig as deep. It’s great for getting things done. It’s also really good when you have content in front of it and just need it to analyze or transform that content. But when I need to really think something through and know it’s going to require multiple steps, I often reach for Claude.

How to practice: Use ChatGPT for time-consuming but straightforward tasks. Create five different versions of a job aid intro. Ask it to turn your presentation outline into a script. Time yourself — notice how it saves you 30 minutes on something that would have taken you an hour and a half to draft from scratch.

Perplexity — Your Research and Citation Partner

Perplexity is honestly my secret weapon for research.

It’s helpful when looking for additional research on learning topics, getting clarity around technical terms, or understanding concepts SMEs present without all the context you may need to fully identify what they’re discussing. This can prevent you from repeatedly reaching out while drafting content and instead allow them to simply review and verify accuracy.

Perplexity is designed to help you find, understand, and cite information in a way that the other tools don’t quite do.

What makes Perplexity special:

This one is underrated for L&D work. We often need to be able to say, “Here’s what the research shows,” and Perplexity makes that easier.

How to practice: Next time you’re designing instruction and content following your analysis, use Perplexity to research the topic and pull citations. Get comfortable with how it presents sources — that’s the skill you’re actually building.

Gemini — The Multimodal Option (and Growing)

Gemini (formerly Bard) gets less attention than the others, which is interesting to me. It’s not because it’s not good — it’s because it’s still finding its footing.

What Gemini brings to the table:

The honest take? Gemini is solid, but I reach for it less frequently than the others because the specific strengths of Claude, ChatGPT, and Perplexity serve my work better. But that might not be true for you — it depends on what you’re optimizing for.

How to practice: Start using Gemini for one specific task — maybe image analysis or writing in Google Docs — and give it a fair test run. You’ll quickly figure out if it works for your workflow.

Other Tools Worth Your Attention

While the big four are where I spend most of my time, there are other AI tools that I found while putting together this article that might be worth exploring:

The thing about exploring these tools? Don’t try to learn everything at once. Start with the four I’ve mentioned. Then, as you identify specific gaps in your workflow, explore other tools to fill them.

The Bottom Line

We’re at an interesting moment in L&D.

These tools are here. They’re useful. But they only become valuable when you use them intentionally and build real skill.

If you’re breaking into the field, learning these tools is part of your competitive advantage. If you’re established, learning these tools may reshape how you approach your work.

The people who will be most successful in 2026 aren’t ignoring AI. They’re thoughtfully experimenting, building judgment, and integrating the right tools into their workflow.

So pick one. Try it. See what happens.

What tools are you using? What’s working for you? I’d love to hear what’s resonating in your own work.
Zach Dornisch

Zach Dornisch

L&D Leader with 10+ years of experience in instructional design, learning strategy, and knowledge management.

← Back to All Posts